MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE
Testimonies of Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Evidence of presence of witnesses at the time of the day was quite natural and possible and no question was raised on the basis of misidentification to believe the accused and his brother. The statement of the eyewitnesses, who could not be prosecuted because of his death, was responsible for the murder trial and had no good reason to acquit the accused because he had a grinding grin. Had no personal ax. The deceased cannot be construed sufficiently to deny their testimony, especially when their presence at the time of the incident cannot be disputed with all the material aspects of the matter at length. The statements of the witnesses were weak in any way, but the bells of truth and completely reliable were accused of failing to identify any controlling circumstances; they were rightly sent. The penalty was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Rahimyar Khan lawyer
