Find a Lawyer

NOOR DIN versus KHUSHI MUHAMMAD

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 9 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 54 Law Martyrdom Order (10 of 1884), Article 17 Suite after paying the cost of its sale through possession of the property by the claimant in possession. Was purchased. The plaintiffs rented part of the said house. The tenant stated that the payment of the rent for the house was stopped, the plaintiff asked the tenant to vacate the house, but in collusion with the claimant, the plaintiff transferred the possession of the house to the claimant instead of the plaintiff and upon receipt of the claimant's possession. Filed a lawsuit for The defendant alleged that the defendant could not prove the sale of the house because of the compensation of the defendants' articles, and the plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff could not prove the sale of the house because only a modest witness sale document was presented. Evidence was presented. The record fully proved that the sale was legitimate in his favor and the possession was given to the defendant / defendant by the defendant himself, but he was not represented by his son. The sale of the house was documented by the law that was executed prior to the enactment of these testimonies, 1984, in the absence of another extraordinary witness, in a logical suit, by the courts, based on a true appreciation of the facts. But given the right of judgment by the courts below, it cannot be intervened. us immigration advocates from Hyderabad lawyer