Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IJAZ QURESHI versus CHANGEZ KHAN, M.I.C.

Section 6 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 200, 202, 203, 204 and 356 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for the recording of polygamous evidence on the husband of section 6 (5) of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961 Action taken under The wife and the trial court asked her to appear in court if she was found guilty. The court alleged that the trial court's order was based on the evidence filed by the Reader of Court which made the provisions of 35 356 mandatory. Is violated. The PCR order passed by the trial court was not subject to the provisions of section 356, CRPC because it was stated that the courts were required to keep the record before the sessions and in the inquiry under CRPC XII, CRPC. Regarding the provisions, the complaint against the husband was filed under Rs.500 crore PC and subsequently proceedings were initiated under sections 202, 203 and 204, CRPC provisions 356, CRPC. The provisions of the Act, which relate to real estate disputes, were not applicable. In the case of the husband, nothing was available to prove that the magistrate / t. Oil Court by Article 200, under the statement of the complainant CR PC was hearing the petition filed by deleting the record as having had his own writing, husband of misunderstanding, ask a advocate free from Peshawar lawyer