STATE versus ANIS BAWANI
Sections 25, 7 and 32 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CR PC) (V9 1898), section 417 of the Paint Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/353/427/435/34/109 against the restoration of evil. The appeal was filed by the Special Anti-Terrorism Court against the acquittal in his capacity as the Additional Advocate General Care was acquitted only on the direction of the Government under Section 25 of the Attorney General or Advocate General Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 Were able to file an appeal against and, through a third category, the Additional Advocate General or the Public Prosecutor, having been acquitted by the Additional Advocate General under section 25 of the said Act. Given the authority to file an appeal against the fact that he was eligible to file an appeal as a public prosecutor, a special law would be enacted under the Misunderstanding Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. Override common law as provided under Section 32 of the Act = Code of Criminal Procedure. 1898 was applied to the special court only to the extent that its provisions were not inconsistent with the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, and in the event of a contradiction, the Code of Conduct disqualified the appeal against dismissing the provisions of 1898. Will be done Being time-barred was not enforceable and was liable to be rejected on this basis.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Neelam lawyer