The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 evidence was not sufficient to conclude that the evidence available on record was sufficient to conclude that the accused could be convicted of a crime against him. The incident happened. At night when everyone was asleep and the people who chose such hours to carry out their tasks, usually, did not provide any opportunity to identify them, from distances during the dark night. And it was not possible in the manner given by the prosecution's witnesses that in the light of the torch, the identity of the accused should not be considered as a piece of evidence and said that the torch was taken into his possession and the preparation was made with two cells. I presented and with the help of the prosecution's witnesses recovered the same suspect. Confidence from anonymous weapons and the recovery of blood-stained land, clothing and vacancy could not be found The accused was not available with the Commission of Crime evidence that the accused was fired by bullets after the incident. In light of the contradictory statements of witnesses regarding the identity of the accused in the dark of the night, the prosecution could not be relied upon. The conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court, in order to prove the accused, was set aside in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
