Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAISAL versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/148/149 Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), 5 7 The testimony of the evidence was delayed by one hour and no explanation was presented by the prosecution for the delay. Which has no identity test. The suspects were arranged by witnesses and no explanation was offered. Later, after the accused was identified in the court, his apparent value was gone, in which case crowds opened fire in the streets and buildings. But the prosecution's witnesses were not presented. No description of who they prosecuted failed to prepare the vehicle for the shooting that took place, which lasted about 10 to 15 minutes, but neither of the accused men. No firearms were found on the walls of any nearby buildings. Records showed that more than 100 fires were reported, but only 5 blanks of Kalashnikov, 2 TT pistol blanks and 1 blank 7 mm rifle were recovered from the side of the accused, while one from the complaining party also recovered. Empty recovery has not been recovered. There has been no serious doubt as to the occurrence of such an incident. Accumulation of blood from the crime scene or from inside the vehicle was on record. The complainant exaggerated and improved his version by applying the accused persons in the case to which he had filed an FIR. Did not mention who said that there was a case of litigation against the accused. Be suspicious of the prosecution by prosecuting the accused persons top civil advocates from Harnai lawyer