HAROON-UR-RASHID versus REGISTRAR BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT, QUETTA
(Ii) Disabled Persons (Employment and Rehabilitation) Ordinance (XL of 1981), Articles 25, 27, 34, 36 and 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan apply for quota seats for persons with disabilities, women and minorities. It targeted the specific seats for the special seats for this seat when it came to recruiting for the positions of civil judges less judicial magistrates, the category of women and minorities can be understood as the first time in Article 27 (1) of the Constitution. The class was rational. For women and non-Muslims, it was neither illegal nor unconstitutional, even though there was no regard for the type / classification of persons with disabilities. The MP was not mentioned but could be classified for the first time in Article 27 (1) of the Constitution and in terms of persons with disabilities (Employment and Rehabilitation) Ordinance, 1981, also challenged by the legislature. Special quotas were imposed on individuals, therefore, the F-Ill and the High Court announced that the same would be observed wherever applicable requests were granted.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
