LEVER BROTHERS PAKISTAN LIMITED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
CPC temporarily filing injections and interlocutory orders Sections 14 and 40 Civil, Code of Conduct (V of 1908), Civil Excisex, RR1 and 2 interim injunction claiming exemption from payment of excise duty Selling Tea Paper Bags (Tea Bags) Responding authorities asked for information about such tea bags as excise duty should have been imposed on such bags. Respondents were sued against such action and the authorities sought interim injunction stating that in its original jurisdiction the denial of such order was denied by the appellant company in the High Court of Appeal. The filter papers were excluded from excise duty while the authorities requested that the bags made of such filter papers were classified separately under separate headings and that they were distinguished from the filtered papers. Which is a question of whether such filter bags were manufactured as the result of the manufacturing process One was that they were able to decide whether there was any responsibility, this ruling of the authorities cannot be explicitly termed the powers of the Central Excise Company, especially for a temporary injunction. Failed to present a case. When only information was obtained and no specific prejudice was being made to the appellant company, such orders of the Authority were deemed inadmissible and the appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
