Find a Lawyer

ASIF PETER versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, MDA, MULTAN

Sections 4, 7, 9 and 44 of the Punjab Development of States Act 1976, the West Pakistan General Clauses Act (XI of 1956), Section 2 (55) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Removal from Article 199 The Constitution's Maintenance of Authority has claimed that the applicant was a public servant and it was a matter of removal from the employment related to the terms and conditions of service and that, under the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court could appeal before the appeal. There was no jurisdiction in the presence of effective treatment. The Authority Petitioner, who was an employee of the Authority who was a legal officer, cannot be considered a public servant as the constitutional application filed by the petitioner was a competent hearing on the specific allegation of infringement under which to impose it. The right to a hearing was given before. The penalty for removing the applicant from service was removed from the service without the need for inquiry by law and without a message to them about the decision that the applicant heard, which the applicant and natural justice principles Was a clear violation of the legal rules governing it. The High Court accepted the constitutional petition, dismissing it as illegal and dismissing it from employment and without lawful authority famous supreme court advocate from Bunner lawyer