Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD versus STATE

The testimony of the prosecution was fully supported by the prosecution's witnesses and the four defendants played a significant role in causing the hatchet and spears to be injured. Was. All the suspects were responsible for the recovery of the weapons related to the crime and the collar account had the full backing of the medical evidence and the complaining party was not proven. The accused was accused of being an assailant, in these circumstances, the appropriate convict and the accompanying accused were related to the accused, and the accused was accused of being empty-handed on the spot and not active in the incident. Participation was not designated except for Lalcarra who did not consider it sufficient to record / maintain his confession, especially when his motive was not attributed to Ott, whose co-accused, about whom I was told that they were armed with Dundas, they did not cause any harm to the accused or the prosecution witnesses. Yes and they had arrived at the scene after hearing the dispute without trial and had no common intention with the main suspect in the murder. 5 302/148/149, P: The accused was not convicted of a co-accused under the PC, but was admitted for minor injury to his presence, participation and prosecution witnesses, Section 324, Under PPC, his conviction was upheld. online advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer