IJAZ KHAN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (C) and 51 (1) bailout, was obtained from the Contraband Heroin Grant Motor Car when charged by the accused. The fact that the heroin was recovered from a shopping bag lying on the feet of the co-accused, an employee of the accused, who was sitting in the front seat at the relevant time, did not create any serious situation for the accused. Will The co-accused confessed to his crime and that he had forgiven the accused in his confessional statement, had no power as the legal statement and property could not be examined at the bail-out stage, but It can be seen by the trial court that the accused involved earlier was involved. Similar to the cases where an FIR was lodged against him, such behavior, the accused and his involvement in the previous case, the initial aspect, showed the accused to deal with the drug. Heroin exceeded the 10kg penalty, which was punishable by death under Section 9 (c), the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997, in these circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer