EAST ASIA TEXTILE INDUSTRIES LTD. versus SAMEERA. HUMAYUN MATIN
Section 15 (2) (ii) of the tenant and the tenant fixed in payment of water and conservation charges claimed that the method of paying the rent of the house in one place was never objected but to prove The tenant was for the house. The landlord periodically agreed to receive the rent in an active installment, but the tenant failed to prove through all the evidence when Landlady proved that the tenant accepted the water charges and conservancy charges. , Which had deliberately and intentionally defaulted on the payment to the tenant. The payment of clean water charges, along with rent, was ordered to be removed from the premises in the right circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Chishtian lawyer
