Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (E.E.) (M), DISTRICT TOBA TEX SINGH

Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974 R 4 Civil Service Appointment Canceled the appointment of public servants and their constitutional request in the Home Adjustment which was asked by the High Court to announce the appointment of public servants. Was allowed. Evidence of unlawful legal authority and unlawful evidence has proven that public servants were appointed by comparative powers after observing all regularity and not related to the minister's order as defendants have alleged. That record employment also shows that public servants were fully eligible for appointment to the relevant positions and it was not a case of any initial irregularities, if any, during the appointment, if any, Reformed by a competent authority, before establishing a constitutional petition by the respondents, The cancellation of the appellate appointments, by the issuance of a writ, did not guarantee the order of the High Court approved in the constitutional petition to invalidate Abio, which was set aside by the High Court of Intra. lawer from fb area from Mardan lawyer