M. ISMAIL SHAHID NAIB TEHSILDAR LAHORE CANTT LAHORE versus SENIOR MEMBER REVENUE
Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Section 21 Promotion Division B / Class Vice-candidates to fill vacant posts by quota of 12% through promotion through divisional, selection / publicity committee, selection of candidates for development of the above post candidates. On the recommendation of such persons, who were also candidates for the said posts, but neglected by the Divisional Selection Committee, they appeared before the Senior Member (Revenue), Board of Revenue / Secretary of Punjab Civil Servant Act, 1974. Representation was filed under 21, which accepted the same case and received remand. Appointments were challenged by the appointees back to the new decision that the representation claims that no representation related to a person's fitness commitment to hold a position or to promote a person is worthwhile, in which both parties are legitimate. The case falls into the category in which the word \ was promoted. Referred to by the competent authority which has disclosed these matters in relation to the terms & c. Appointments and non-appointments in connection with the service of others, in these circumstances, to enter representation under section 21 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Were in favor of.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Nankana Sahib lawyer