Find a Lawyer

MUHAINMAD SHABBIR versus STATE

The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/16 Testimony of evidence The complainant's statement regarding the incident, as well as the prosecution's witnesses, found the affected girl crying on the stairs of the mosque. Shalwar was stained with blood and confirmed by the statement of Lady Doctor who examined the affected girl that reports from the Chemical Examiner's bushes proved that she had been subjected to adultery. Because he was strong in his statement. The defendant's confession that the trial version's suspicion arose from the non-examination of any independent witness at the location was withdrawn because in the specific circumstances, the question of investigating any independent witness did not arise because it It is on record that the accused was arrested by an excuse. Other students were released The accused alleged that he was not appointed to the mosque Father / affected person says he belonged to another sect and was therefore involved. The accused was not only charged with any power, but he did not appeal because no father would honor his daughter. When her daughter was charged with such an allegation, she did not present any defense evidence nor chose to examine herself under section 340 (2); the CCPC prosecution prosecuted her case. The trial court had convicted the accused through a trial court. Accordingly, keeping in view the age of the accused, less advocate for immigration from FR Peshawar lawyer