Find a Lawyer

SHADI KHAN versus HAZRAT UMAR

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, the cancellation of the accused was declared a routine minor role of Lalakar, except for the case of empty-handed prosecution. It was not that the accused had misbehaved. Either way there was a backdrop of blood animosity between the parties involved in the bail, considering the cancellation of the bail was different, the court refused to allow the trial court to interfere with the defendant's release, with the observation that The trial court's opinions / opinions are presented in court. It had no effect on the record that the principal accused had followed the accused's instruction or that the accused had been declared innocent, neither wanted nor allowed in the bail phase because the parties involved. Anyone can doubt anything. famous supreme court advocate from Laliah lawyer