Find a Lawyer

KANKUN (PVT.) LTD. versus APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT/PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Sections 2, 3, 5 and 6 (as amended by the Central Adaptation of Law Order (1/64 of 19)) Pakistan Mining Concession Rules, 1960, R77 Punjab Mining Concession Rules, 1986, RR 90 and 98 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for a dispute over the amount of royalty related to the coal and coal mines dispute The petitioner of the provincial government preferred such appeal against the notice for such demand and The case applied for decision during the approval of the appeal is mediated by the Provincial Government through the applicant under the arbitration rule of Pakistan Mining Concession Rules, 1960 The provision of mediation that was available under Pakistan's mining concessions Rules, 1960 CR 77, and the incentives were available. For the applicant, because this matter was a provincial subject, the concept of arbitration by the Federal Government, granting the validity of the Pakistan Mining Concession rules, 1960 R77, he wanted the appropriate ministry petitioner to have the Secretary Provincial Government mediate in this matter. And the Secretary of State for the Central Government may not exercise the jurisdiction granted under the Punjab Mining Concession Rules 1986, it was applied since the Mining Concession Rules, 1989 and Pakistan. With regard to the land mines mentioned in Section 6 of the Regulation of Mines and Oil Fields and Mineral Development (Government Control) Act, 1948, there was no application in Punjab province, the applicant's power was inconsistent, inconsistent and not accepted. Could go immigration advocates phone number from Mari Indus lawyer