Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SARWAR versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/148/149 The defendant was injured by the definition of evidence while he was armed with a 12 bore gun which was recovered to him, for example chemical inspector, serologist and forensic scientist. Laboratory reports were positively ocular. The account was assisted by medical evidence, the prosecutor's injured witness, and the complainant's FIR. Was retained, but due to family honor, the High Court adopted a civilian view and the trial court sentenced the accused to death and sentenced him to life imprisonment, but one of the co-accused was charged. He was armed with a rifle, but was told that the rifle was not recovered on the report and the co-accused was not accused of causing any injury to the victim or the injured. The second coxed was empty-handed and did not take part in the incident, the co-accused was declared innocent in the investigation; Bad best advocate from Pishin lawyer