Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA ANJUM versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 Anti-Corruption Act (11 of 1947), Section 5 (2) was charged with defining evidence against someone else while the evidence was run against another person and section 342, CRPC. There was no evidence that the questions were different in nature. The chairman of the Town Committee, who was also charged, was presented with a signature and raiding magistrate's handwriting identification, neither the accused nor the witness and the Town Committee The secretary, who was an accused, was also referred to as a witness and the other two accused were also included. In addition, the commercial analyst did not have an invoice report, but an incomplete measurement book of controversial materials used in the construction work, based on which the evaluation report was prepared, presented during the investigation or before the trial court. Notwithstanding, in the case of the prosecution in the case of many defects, the benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused and the sentences punishing and punishing them were put aside and they were immediately. Was released famous high court advocate from Chaininda lawyer