Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AHMED YAR versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 142 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the applicants requesting the conclusions of the courts under the disputes relating to illegal possession, possession of suit property had no title in the property of the applicants and they were the only property Was the owner of The three courts below the grounds of adverse possession found that the respondents were the owners of the suit property and that the simultaneous discoveries were in accordance with the law, it appears that the applicants did not advise the respondents even in cross-examination. The defendants were not owners. The High Court correctly pointed out in the order that the petitioners had heard contradictory petitions. The applicants had no title to the suit property which the applicants could not get involved with the defendants and withdraw the negative possession request. The law, which allowed leave of appeal, was denied

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from South Wazirstan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.