Find a Lawyer

GOHAR ALI SHAH versus STATE

Sections 145 and 561 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) had commenced the proceedings and an unclean order to seal the disputed property was passed on the occasion, the petitioner's decision of the trial court Should have waited. At the same time, by appealing to the heir jurisdiction of the High Court, applying for the possession of the disputed premises on the section H report, which the applicant was contending, presented the petition to the trial court, at this time. 6161 AA recognizes the possibility of imminent existence, peace breach and bloodshed due to a dispute over the occupation of the property High Court, CRPC could not take the role of trial court and determine the truth Could not review the evidence to do so. For a detailed inquiry into the possession of the disputed property by a party, the impugned order approved under Section 145 (4) of the Magistrate, CRP did not confirm it. The request to stop the proceedings against any legal or factual weakness was misunderstood and premature and accordingly was dismissed. famous high court advocate from Wan Radha Ram lawyer