PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus IBRAHIM AND SONS
The S42 Partnership Act (IX of 1932), the suit for recovery of section 69, was the concern of the affected plaintiff in the non-registration of litigation, because the plaintiffs did not raise the issue in their written statement because the plaintiff's partnership firm lacked registration. Is. Under the Partnership Act, 1932, effective plaintiffs were not obliged to submit a certificate of registration or to make any statement on this aspect, but no earlier recovery petition was filed in the name of a concrete decision in a constitutional petition. Because the plaintiffs had no opportunity to establish the firm's registration or to dismiss the charge for non-registration
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Lalamusa lawyer
