Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR BARLAS versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 199 Compliance with Order of Illegal Acquisition of Property (Special Committee) Ordinance (IX of 1969), Removal of Section 5 (Special Provisions) Regulation (MLR No. 58), Para 3 Constitution Petition for Civil Service Installation Service Tribunal Was dismissed. On the basis of an inquiry made under section 5 of the Illegal Acquisition of Property (Special Committee) Ordinance, 1969, the Federal Service Tribunal rejected the dismissal order, but the authorities rejected paragraph 3 of the MLR 58 proceeding. Did not restore the applicant under. The military tribunal did not in any way conform to the MLR provisions. 58 The applicant was not given the proper opportunity to meet the allegations leveled against him and no witness could take part in the proceedings in support of his defense. Was not allowed where there was already a military tribunal. A secret list, previously prepared by the Marshall Law Authorities, which contained up to the merchandise, mentioned the proposed shemit given to the applicant, in the presence of such a list, Malala's malpractice action was being taken against Malala throughout the exercise. With no action under the law and what is not being linked, the High Court directed the authorities to implement it. Order of the service tribunal to restore the applicant online advocate from Bolan lawyer