Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS.2367/LB TO 2370; LB OF 1999 versus I.T.AS. NOS.2367/LB TO 2370; LB OF 1999

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 66 Income Tax Rules, 1982, R3 (2) (c) The director of a company, working full time for a company was the director of a company and he also operated his own private business. Announced his salary income. In addition, income from other private businesses was claimed to be exempt under the R3 (2) (c) of Income Tax Rules 1982, on which the inspecting officer made the inspection additional commissioner on this basis. Diagnosis canceled that it could not cause ascites. A company is considered to be a full time employee because he was engaged in a business other than pay drawing as a company director and, therefore, Assisi was not entitled to an exemption if a person works for a company full time. If so, his involvement in private businesses will not be excluded from the scope of R3 (2) (c) of the Income Tax Rules 1982, since he cannot be considered for running his own private business. It is permissible for a person to be engaged in private business while it is permissible for him to work for another company, while also working for company roll 3 (2) (c), income tax rolls 1982. For a company that is working full time, working full time for a company only matters if one person is working for multiple companies because R 3 (2) (c) only permits. The lawsuit was implemented to discourage abuse of law provisions relating to claims of immunity. Working in a company and joining a private business has to no avail, but it does immigration advocates email from Khewra lawyer