Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 394 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement, HUDD) Ordinance (VI 1979), Sections 20 and 24 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203G, presented to the High Court Maintenance Challan against the accused under Appeal Section. 393 and 454, the PPC read with section 17 (2) of the Criminal Property Enforcement Ordinance, 1979. After the 1979 Sessions Court indictment and trial, it was found that the case did not fall within the scope of the offense imposed on Haddad. And as a result, the accused was convicted under PPP 394, PPC, and sentenced to four years in prison \ RI as a trader, with a fine observation by the trial court in this unjustified decision that the matter. There was no evidence to bring Hood into law. No, there was no doubt that they caused confusion, otherwise the offenders were convicted under Section 20 of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Code) Ordinance, 1979, and the section 24 of the said ordinance overruled the Federal Law Shariat. The same was the case when the sentence was exceeded by two years. Article 203G of the Constitution also created a restriction in the matter to give the Federal Shariah Court special jurisdiction. Therefore, the court was unable to hear and decide the appeal which was directed to return the accused to appear before the Federal Shariat Court. Pakistan, top advocate family court from FR Peshawar lawyer