MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MUHAMMAD ASHIQ
Civil Code 1908 Section 96 (3) and AXXIII, R 2 Offer of consent was offered by the defendant's lawyer, which was appealed by the lower appellate court before the lower appellate court decided the appeal. Was accepted by the plaintiff's lawyer during the proceedings. The claim filed by the plaintiff by the plaintiff was that his lawyer accepted the offer without authorization. The plaintiff did not, either by filing a review before the Lower Appellate Court or by applying Section 12 of the CPC 2) by filing an application under provocation of the consent decree. Appeal / complaint for litigation or professional misconduct was filed. Proper weight must be given to the statement of counsel's advice. Are. Arriving between the parties through their counsel was neither void nor disappointing, according to section 96 (3), CPC's consent.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Kandiaro lawyer