GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus AL-FAROOQ ROLLER FLOUR MILLS LTD
Contract Violation of Contract Act 1872 Section 73 The claim for compensation for breach of contract can be claimed under Section 73, Contract Act 1872, only if the damage was caused by the above violation, the principle of recovery of damages is legally recognized. Violations of all types of damages were different from the general rule and no breach of contract could be claimed as a result of breach of contract. Defeating the contract or claiming a better position without fulfilling its obligation, the breach of the contract was to be specifically proved by someone and unless it was done, it would be possible to find out why it was a common allegation. It was not who had violated the claimant in this way. The plaintiff cannot claim any money damages because the damages which were due to his own negligence were the responsibility of the plaintiff to take all reasonable steps for it. Reduce this loss and if it suffered any loss due to their own failure to perform part of the contract, the breach of contract did not accept damages under the Contract Act 1872 or under the Tour This may be because he is being neglected in self-performance. Due to this, the defendant could not request a breach of contract
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Kalaswala lawyer