Find a Lawyer

MAZHAR HAIDER versus ALI AHMAD

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 17, 79, 95 and 118 suits challenged the execution of the power of attorney to declare power of attorney in favor of the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiff. Was. The plaintiff was argued in favor of the plaintiff The plaintiff alleged that the controversial General Power of Attorney and the mutant was the result of fraud and misrepresentation; the plaintiff's rights were unlawful and ineffective, even though it was registered. , But neither the sub-registrar, who registered it, was presented to corroborate his document, nor was the person who said that the executive of the document was identified. I was presented, when a document, its implementation was denied and it was also suspicious, so it is a burden to prove the above ten The person who benefits from Talisman can be exchanged. The man was called and hanged, in whose presence he was hanged. The Seed Power of Attorney, which was not substantiated by a minor witness, executive and sub-registrar identifier, was not a valid document, and no credibility could be attached to it. property advocate from Barkhan lawyer