Find a Lawyer

BABAR ZAFAR versus THE STATE

The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) ordinance 1979 section 11 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the testimony of section 7 evidence was examined by prosecution despite the incident in a densely populated area before the court. No independent witness was presented. The eyewitnesses were related to the complainant and although they claim to be the resident of the incident, they did not actually hold the identity parade in any way after the arrest of the accused kidnapper until they were five days old. And did not raise any alarm at the time of the abduction. The love letters and photos shown on the record showed a love affair between the abductor and the principal accused abductor AP on the request of his father and other relatives in this case. The departing investigation could not find any trace, the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. how to become a advocate from Lower Dir lawyer