Find a Lawyer

MAULA DAD versus FAZAL DAD

In the provisions of Sections 122 and 123 of the Property Relief Act 1882 (of 1877), the validity of the section 42 suit gifted, the plaintiff alleges that the separation of suit land in favor of the defendant in the conversion of the gift was invalid and illegal. This was because the change in the record authority's approval of the defendant through fraud and misrepresentation proved that the plaintiff and the plaintiff were brothers, but their relationship changed. Before the tension was created, the property was not given to the defendant in the dispute. And also, the plaintiff was still unable to disclose the land in favor of his brother in the possession of the plaintiff / alleged donor gift when their relationship was under tension and the court's orders were not involved in any misunderstanding or evidence. Suffering from non-readability. Not interfered with by the High Court law firms from Chak Jhumra lawyer