Find a Lawyer

SHAH WALI versus THE STATE

Section 9 (c) of the Control of Drugs Act 1997 was defined as evidence qualified witnesses who acted illegally against police officers, who supported the prosecution case, and their testimony was solely because of police personnel. Could not be excluded. Their own sources cannot be believed to implicate the drug on the accused. The defense request cannot be relied on as being contradictory to itself. Evidence regarding drug recovery from the accused was inconsistent with the chemical auditor's findings. There was a positive delay in the drug / marijuana and opiate chemical inspector's seizure, and the prosecutor's trial on that report was not deadly. The trial court found the accused guilty by a reasonable decision. It was neither obnoxious nor arbitrary and would maintain the conviction of the accused in the circumstances divorce advocates from Kharian lawyer