Find a Lawyer

SAID MUHAMMAD KHAN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 382B (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 307 of the Criminal Laws of the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Special Provisions) Regulations (I of 1975), S: 3 Provinces The availability of the benefit of CR 382 to the accused in the Tribal Areas (Nifaz e Nizam eShariah) Regulation (II of 1994), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 247 (3), the dispute was intended to be provincial. According to the Criminal Law (Special Provisions) Rule 2 PLD 1995 SC 281, Section 382B, CRPC of the Tribal Areas on 1 of 1975, the Supreme Court declared the violation of the Constitution as a violation of the Constitution. Manual for benefit B. The first reason was because this argument was not discussed. Rule 1 of 1975, before the original, appellate, or revision forum formulated under the Criminal Laws (Special Provisions) of the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas and could not be legally allowed. O Be the first to step so late. Second, the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Code, which included section 382B, did not apply to the tribal areas administered by the Provinces as contemplated under Article 247 (3) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court in its judgment gave 12 2. According to the 1994 report, PLD 1995 SC 281 declared that the matter would not affect both criminal and civil matters which had been dealt with by the jirga established under the aforesaid regulation jirga, in the present case 27 1 1991. Presented their award to And even the revision court, which was the final court under the rules, ruled in this case on 10-2 1992, before finally the date of the Supreme Court decision. criminal advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer