Find a Lawyer

TARIQ MEHMOOD versus INSPECTOR- GENERAL OF POLICE

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, dismissing the service of civil servants, police constable, absence of duty without permission, the service tribunal rejected the appeal of a public servant. It was reported that the Deputy Inspector General of Police caps noted that the government employee received as many as 55 bad entries, compared to only a good entry in the record in his service. He was also acquitted on the same charge in 1992, but was reinstated with a soft attitude. The DIG and the IG rejected his appeal and review, saying his service record was utterly disappointing. In the case of a civil servant, the order was passed on 26th 1996 and instead of filing an appeal before the service tribunal within a period of 30 days, the appeal was filed on 19-10 1998 which was largely banned. In which civil servants were responsible for themselves. Except for the time before the service tribunal to resort to appellate remedies, without the exception that his absence was neither intentional nor intentional, to explain the delay of each day, whichever Serious attempts were made, the DIG and the IGP did not review the records of the public servant without any basis showing that whoever applied for leave to appeal against the service law tribunal's order No concrete law question was excluded. when you need a advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer