Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/364 definition of evidence was lodged with the FIR, when the victim's body was recovered after about seven days, and the delay in filing the FIR raised suspicion about the prosecution's story, for the last time. Of the three witnesses seen in the evidence, two were close relatives of the deceased and the third, who was not a relative of the victim, was not presented, and no other independent witness of the last seen evidence was produced by the prosecution, The extra-judicial confession of the accused in connection with the deceased's two close relatives was not admissible for evidence, especially when Unbelievable that the recovery of the offensive weapon was violated 103 violations, the doctor's PC report which examined the deceased's post-mortem showed that the victim's face could not be identified = the victim's body was identified and To say with certainty that this was, especially when the body of the accused did not have to be recovered, especially when the tractor trolley was never recovered when identifying a case against the accused allegedly belonging to the victim. They were just circumstantial evidence, the court had to see that the chain of circumstantial evidence was linked in such a way that Man should lead to the execution that were not available in this case. Prosecutor failed to prove his case beyond a shadow of a doubt, the trial court adjourned the trial against the convicted and sentenced defendant. immigration advocates email from Rohri lawyer