MUHAMMAD RAZIQ versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Advertising Remarks Expansion A public servant was promoted to Joint Secretary in 1995, who was given negative comments in 1995 who were not yet eligible to be promoted and immediately returned to office by the Establishment Division. Was transferred to the General and announced. Less than average employees in the Emotional Stability column, throughout their service career, from the position of department officer to their development, during any job, right from the position of their joint secretary, to any advice, warning or consultation. Did not receive. From the post of the section officer to the Joint Secretary in B20, the government job was due to dedication, dedication and sincerity with his job. Government employees were given negative opinion only on dissenting opinion on certain matters. It was also proved that in the absence of any false accusation, it would be harmful for a public servant to give negative remarks to abduction or ill-treatment of a public servant, negative comments against him, not justified against a public servant. Ad remarks ordered to be dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Jhang lawyer