GHULAM CHANNA versus STATE
The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code section 302 was found in the dispute between the complainant's ocular account, who was the eyewitness, and medical evidence related to the casualty's injuries led to the presence of the complainant on the spot. The pistol that was recovered was sent to the firearm specialist more than one month after the incident and the firearm expert allegedly sent the recovered boxes and the firearm expert's report revealed that the accused had been falsely intercepted. Does not match the blank pistol recovered from the spot on the spot. The accused involved in the crime cannot be denied, in which case the benefit of the doubt found in the prosecution will, thus, go to the accused and the accused was sentenced by the trial court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer
