HAJI BAHADAR KHAN versus THE STATE
The eye witnesses presented by the prosecution were not only closely related to each other, but were also related to the deceased in the house in which the incident occurred, in view of the value of evidence in the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34. None of the prisoners were presented or presented as prosecution witnesses because witnesses were not residents of the scene of the incident and the triggering of the incident was impossible and unreliable because of the enmity between the parties. No previous background was available No evidence was received from the accused that clearly contradicts the Ocular Account and medical evidence. Yin was found. The prosecution was not harmed for failing to prove the case against the accused, the accused was tried and sentenced during the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer
