BAHADAR ALI KHAN versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code section 467/468/471/419/420 against the verdict against the Ordinance of Banks (Special Courts) (IX of 1984), Sections 2 and 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Articles 403 (1) and 417. The Appellate High Court ruled that the prosecution had not been prosecuted in view of the contradictions and contradictions in the prosecution case, but did not identify or discuss any such contradictions and contradictions. And as such the order passed by the High Court was not lasting. Providing section 3403 (t), the CCCC may be barred from holding the trial of the accused in the same offense only if it is immediately prosecuted by a competent Magistrates' Court in this case. In which the accused was not eligible to prosecute in connection with the crimes committed. He has been mentioned in the Ordinance of the Banks (Special Courts), 1984 in 1984, which was adopted in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, his succession order in favor of the accused and the High Court did not maintain it. Effective orders to acquit the accused were tried in accordance with the criminal jurisdiction of the trial and according to law the special court was remanded for trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer