Find a Lawyer

XIOMORIA MARIA DE ARAMS TROJILLO versus STATE

Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Sections 403 and 561A Customs Act (IV 1969), Sections 2 (5) and 156 (1) (8) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 7 And 9 (c) Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 13 (1) Applicability of Double Risk Applicable Procedure against whom Action was taken And he was convicted by a special court. (Customs and Taxation) For trying to smuggle heroin and possessing heroin it was claimed that once heroin was smuggled and heroin was the same crime, in another FIR related to heroin crime. The invoice was a violation of Article 13. a), Constitution of Pakistan (1973) and Section 403, CRPC were also violated because their trial is at double risk which was not guaranteed by law and this case will be successful on the charge of suicide and Was able to punish himself. Wee was twice convicted for the same crime under Hayden's Smuggling Crime Customs Act, 1969, while possessing a narcotic drug (heroin) was convicted under the Narcotic Substances Stances Act 1997, in which case it was the same. Were not of nature but were separate offenses. The second trial can be stopped only if the crime was the same, but if the offense was separate, the accused could be tried before two different courts on the basis of a joint set of facts under two different laws and the case. The accused will not be banned, the accused has not been sent to trial. In different courts, under the same crime but under clear and varied crimes, the trial of the accused, under the circumstances, the Constitution of Pakistan (1) jobs for advocates from Loralai lawyer