Find a Lawyer

NAWAZ SHARIF versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section (2) and 196 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 7, 12, 19, 30 and 32 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122 and 123 had filed petitions under the Criminal Procedure 5 applications 196 for crimes against the State's ability to prosecute, while the PC claimed that it had filed cases against the State against it. , Its knowledge could not be taken up to this point unless it could be banned in section 196. The accused has further asserted that the provisions of Section 196, CR PC are compulsory in nature. Unless the prohibition contained in the aforesaid section is approved by a competent person after the approval of the Central or Provincial Government, the court cannot admit the crime against it, of a special court established under the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act. The lawsuit is filed under qualified litigation. , 1997, section 196, provisions of the CCPC relating to common law, shall not apply to proceedings before a special court because the Act which was a special law is subject to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 or any other law. However, it did not have much effect. s996 does not apply to the contradictory and discriminatory proceedings relating to the contradictory effect between the provisions of section 30 of the CRPC, the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and the section 32 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 196, 1898. Involved in section 196 of the Act and included in the bar, the CCP shall not in any case affect the ability of the court to exercise special powers in exercising its powers under section 19 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. immigration advocates phone number from Jamrud Road lawyer