Find a Lawyer

ASIF ALI ZARDARI versus STATE

The Special Court remanded the remand of the accused to the Pakistan Penal Code section 302 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 13 (3) 19 (4) and 19 (5) Criminal Code (V9 1898), Sections 167 and 439. The request for custody of the police from the jail for seven days from the date of the SP's custody was approved before the transfer of the accused remand order from the Central Jail to the CIA police. ? The accused was handed over to the DSP on Sunday, meaning there was no reason for the holidays, as required under section 167 (3), CCPC and section 19 (4) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. No order was given in the order to provide physical remand for the accused. A copy of the remand order was not sent to the relevant session judge or the accused at court at the time of the remand order was not complied with the law. At any point, detaining the accused from the Central Jail is appropriate for those who were against the court instead of seeking the remand of the accused from the police in which the case is pending and who has granted the accused's bail. Had approached another special court for The motive, which again violated the decisions of the High Courts, was not transferred to the remand grant by the state prosecutor, nor was any law officer considered under section 19 (5) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. , Only the Administrative Judge was authorized. Obtain the required remand of the accused in view of section 13 (3) of the said Act, and the court which passed the remand order had taken unlawful action and the improper order without jurisdiction was set aside under the circumstances. famous lower court advocate from Mardan lawyer