Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 365 A / 149 & 395/149 Definition of Evidence The purpose of conducting an identity test for the purpose of identifying the accused was meaningless and has no identifiable or valuable value by the abductors. With no motive for motivating and making false accusations of criminals, the indictment of the accused can be accepted in court as the kidnapper was released 23 days after his abduction on payment of ransom. Daily meeting with other bandits impressed them that the kidnappers belonged to a wealthy family and that a good amount of ransom could be paid for their release and, therefore, in their case, they turned to the accused. Was the joint intention in the defense application raised from. False opportunities in the case were not proved on the record There was no victim to the evidence by the trial court. If found guilty of the offense under 5 36 365A, the PPC was affirmed to reduce its sentence, no offense, however, against the accused under section 9595/149, PPC. Was acquitted of the charge. top advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer