ABDUL RAZZAQ versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL
Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A, 4, 199 and 212 Maintaining Constitutional Appeal Adding Articles 2A to the Constitution Applying for the release of salaries Application authority for five months salary of public servants Was stopped, the authority filed for its release failed to decide the application at the appropriate time, the government employee filed a constitutional petition before the High Court to resolve the authority's complaint, it was a request, release of salary. Government employees for did not file through appropriate. The channel and that the constitutional petition was not enforceable pursuant to Article 212 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), was read with section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, there was no power to object to the authorization of the authority because the High Court had to make public There were not enough powers to instruct the workers to act according to the law envisaged by Article 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) under Article 212 of the Constitution, Article 212 of the Constitution, the powers of the High Court were not stripped, In order to act in accordance with the law, public workers are instructed to act in accordance with the law and the responsibility of the public workers is It did not object to the request. Filed by the proper channel, it had no power because after the enactment of Article 2A in the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the courts were expected to decide cases on merit rather than technically, the High Court, Under the circumstances, the Authority should strictly decide on the request of public servants. In accordance with the law within a specified period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Sidhnoti lawyer