Find a Lawyer

RASHID versus STATE

The testimony of section 2302 / ?88 / ?99 evidence was not brought to the record to complain that the complainant was subjected to any enmity / animosity or illicit desire to engage them. May demand that the accused / appellants in the case have been falsely accused in their statements under section 2342; CRPC cannot, nor can they, dismiss the complainant's allegations in his statement of oath. Has not presented evidence in its defense nor has it examined itself as its own witnesses under Section 40 2 (1), CRPC has admitted to the accused. Currently statements had been recorded correctly. Repeated conduct was conducted in which the accused were properly identified. Due to misidentification the question did not arise and the case was filed within a short period of time. The trial court, in the circumstances, properly prosecuted and sentenced the trial court accused on the basis of proper definition of evidence. ? Failure to read or proof cannot be interfered with immigration advocates from Jauharabad lawyer