Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SULEMAN versus SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, LARKANA


Section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), charges of section 555 in which the accused was dependent on the money of the thief, bhang and partner with other criminals and section 14 of a criminal case against them. Were the accused under The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979 did not satisfy the proper grounds for initiating proceedings against them under section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act, 1975, and the Tribunal pursuant to sections 5 and 6 of the said Act. Did not comply with the mandatory provisions. Despite issuing summons, non-bailable warrants were issued against the accused before the tribunal could be restrained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Sohawa District Jelum lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.