Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SULEMAN versus SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, LARKANA


Section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), charges of section 555 in which the accused was dependent on the money of the thief, bhang and partner with other criminals and section 14 of a criminal case against them. Were the accused under The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979 did not satisfy the proper grounds for initiating proceedings against them under section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act, 1975, and the Tribunal pursuant to sections 5 and 6 of the said Act. Did not comply with the mandatory provisions. Despite issuing summons, non-bailable warrants were issued against the accused before the tribunal could be restrained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Tando Adam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.