Find a Lawyer

LEVER BROTHERS PAKISTAN LIMITED versus ATIQA ODHO

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Trademarks Act (V of 1940), Section 24 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OXXX, RR 1 and 2 Interim Order Interpretation, Interpretation of Specific Performance of Contractual Controversy between the Parties In relation to The agreement in which the plaintiff contends that after the termination of the contract the defendants have no right to use promotional material based on the plaintiff's photographs was disputed by the defendants alleging that such material Can be used as a permanent property of. Following the termination of this agreement, the High Court, in its original jurisdiction, believed that the defendant might be entitled to retain such promotional materials, but upon termination of the contract he would be entitled to serve it for advertising purposes. Were not entitled to use. The right to apply for a trademark and registration of the material containing the photographs of the claimant has been assigned to maintain it without the use of the property under section 24 of the Trademarks Act, 1940, which has no meaning. And was not subscribed to the High Court without any use and utility entertained by the High Court. Court's Appeal for Misrepresentation of the Terms of the Agreement between the Parties immigration advocates email from Lasbela lawyer