Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MIAN KHAN

Code of Conduct 1908 Section 302 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Petal Law Enforcement Advertisement (IX of 1974), Section 5 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), in view of the value of Section 103 evidence, witnesses proved the material details of the case, Were positive and conclusive. The defense of the presence of eyewitnesses at the scene of the incident was acknowledged by their defense in their investigation, which acknowledged their full testimony, which could not be permanently denied by the eyewitnesses. Two other suspects were also involved in the commission of the crime, confirming the post-mortem report of the incident's eyewitness account, site plan and several recovered receipts, including security at the site, which was provided by the Franz Science Laboratory. Was fired by the source. The pistol recovered from the manufacture of a pistol by the accused by the accused cannot be traced to the meaning of section 103. The presence of the CRPC was proved by prosecution without any ambiguity as witnesses testified. Given that the defense version was impossible, the argument was followed and the accused was sentenced, the eyewitnesses examined by the prosecution in the cases, however, did not meet the standard of evidence required in the case of the accused, but Tamir But the charge of murder was substantiated. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Tarnol lawyer