Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD AHMAD versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 The testimony of the two accused who were with the accused, the trial court acquitted on the same evidence, the complainant admitted during cross-examination that his mother had appeared before the police superintendent during the investigation. Appeared and stated that there was someone other than the accused, who had not recovered any crime or any weapon, due to injury to the deceased by the carbine when physical remand was obtained on the identification of the accused. The motive was too far away, there was a significant witness to the incident and the trial was not brought before the court. It was contended that if this testimony was presented by the prosecution, it would not support the prosecution's case, both the witnesses presented by the prosecution were the sons of the deceased trial court, both the accused being section 307 /. Was acquitted on the charge under 34, PPC, although the FIR was told that one of the accused had reached the WW ith Sota the complainant and the sentence given to the accused in these circumstances. The benefit of the doubt was set to expand family advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer