Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/34 definition of evidence was the testimony of the complainant who was the wife of the accused and admitted to himself that he did not confirm the inquiry report, although other prosecution witnesses were not related to the subpoena. But he was a resident of the complainant village and his presence with the deceased at the relevant time spoke of his close association with the late Syed prosecutor's witness was also an opportunity witness to visit the other village. Also on record through independent evidence was uncertain and did not confirm the memorandum on the blood-stained ground. Was not retrieved from the site and signed the inquiry report. The eyewitness testimony presented by the prosecution failed to obtain a warrant for its intended purpose: the complainant's bold statement in connection with the alleged motive was completely misleading or had any other endorsement. The other piece of evidence on record was that the recovery of the carbine from the accused's possession during the investigation compiled by the prosecution was legally unforgettable as no crime was left vacant at the scene of the incident so it was said that the carbine or The accused did not provide the necessary support to provide medical help to the accused. Eyewitnesses who testified through the prosecution, rather than contradicting the ocular account, failed to prove their case against the accused beyond suspicion, giving him the benefit of the doubt and were acquitted. pakistani advocates Hangu lawyer