MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE
Although the complainant was the brother of the accused, appreciating the Pakistan Penal Code Section 222 evidence, he was a natural witness to the incident that took place immediately after his house and he allegedly falsely accused the accused. There was no reason or purpose to substitute. In the relevant time, the accused himself was admitted by the accused himself, in the plea of defendant's defense that the victim was executed in defense of his life, did not seem reasonable or understandable. The complainant did that which was natural. And no evidence can be discounted on the evidence presented, after the prosecution proved the suspect to be beyond doubt, the defendant was rightly sentenced and sentenced, leading to the death of the victim. Be dead
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Sanghar lawyer